<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com">
<title>Phlebology recent issues</title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com</link>
<description>Phlebology RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Phlebology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0268-3555</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/191?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/201?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/208?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/215?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/237?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/238?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/145?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/151?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/157?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/166?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/183?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/189-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/189-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/190?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/97?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/98?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/108?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/114?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/120?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/139?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/13?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/34?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/42?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/50?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/62?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/191?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Australasian College of Phlebology and its role]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/191?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thibault, P K]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09e004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Australasian College of Phlebology and its role]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>192</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>191</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/193?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Arterio-venous malformation: how much do we know?]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/193?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Arterio-venous malformation (AVM) is a congenital vascular malformation that is neither a venous malformation nor a haemangioma. An AVM is a potentially life-threatening and limb-threatening lesion, especially the &lsquo;fistulous&rsquo; truncular form due to its unique embryological and haemodynamic characteristics. AVM treatment requires an early aggressive approach, one that is careful and based on a thorough assessment of the risks and benefits associated with the treatment plan.</p>
<p>A successful treatment strategy requires an accurate assessment of the AVM taking into account the extent, severity and progression of the lesion. This is critical in order to minimize the morbidity associated with the currently available therapies. A multidisiciplinary approach that integrates endovascular and surgical therapy can substantially improve the treatment results seen in patients with AVMs. Preliminary treatment of a fistulous AVM with coil embolization is essential in order to minimize associated morbidity and to alter the lesion haemodynamics from a high-flow lesion to a low-flow lesion that is more amenable to subsequent, definitive management with ethanol or NBCA glue embolo/sclerotherapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, B B, Lardeo, J, Neville, R]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.009032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Arterio-venous malformation: how much do we know?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>200</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Venous Disease A-Z series: no. 12</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/201?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Popliteal vein compression syndrome: obesity, venous disease and the popliteal connection]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/201?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Obesity and venous disease are commonly encountered together. The aetio- logical relationship, however, has not been clear. Popliteal venous compression (PVC) has been encountered both on ultrasound and venographically. In this study, patients with symptoms and/or signs of chronic venous hypertension with PVC were investigated and the relationship to obesity was defined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 89 patients were included in the study, of which 49 limbs were classified as having PVC defined as a greater than 90% reduction in the maximum internal diameter (ID) of the popliteal vein (POPV) with knee locking. Forty consecutive limbs with venous disease with no evidence of PVC were used as controls. The body mass index (BMI) of each group was calculated and the clinical symptoms and signs were documented. After the failure of conservative treatment, 30 of the 49 underwent open popliteal decompression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients with PVC were found to have a BMI of 34.6 &plusmn; 6.2 compared with 25.3 &plusmn; 3.0 of the controls. The POPV ID in the PVC group before and after knee locking changed from 11.7 &plusmn; 5.0 to 1.0 &plusmn; 2.1 mm, respectively. Postoperatively, the POPV ID before and after knee locking changed from 10.2 &plusmn; 2.2 to 9.0 &plusmn; 1.5 mm, respectively. At 16.2 &plusmn; 12.1 months follow-up, all the major clinical parameters improved at a statistically significant level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There appears to be a relationship between obesity, chronic venous disease and PVC. POPV compression syndrome may clarify the previously unexplained venous presentations. Surgical decompression provides good results in patients unresponsive to conservative treatment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lane, R J, Cuzzilla, M L, Harris, R A, Phillips, M N]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2008.008039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Popliteal vein compression syndrome: obesity, venous disease and the popliteal connection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>207</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>201</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/208?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment of incompetent perforating veins using the radiofrequency ablation stylet: a pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/208?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Although the role of incompetent perforating veins (IPV) in chronic venous insufficiency remains controversial, they are often treated by surgical or by minimal invasive techniques.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe the procedure of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of IPV and to evaluate its short-term effectiveness and safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In a clinical pilot study, 14 IPV in 12 patients were treated with a radiofrequency stylet. After three months, ultrasound (US) examination was used to assess anatomical success rate and exclude deep venous thrombosis. Also, self-reported side-effects were investigated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 14 treated IPV, nine (64%) were obliterated on US examination and the others showed remaining reflux. Two patients reported localized paresthesia, but no deep venous thrombosis was recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>RFA of IPV may be a promising procedure, but patient and incompetent perforator vein selection is important and further standardization of the procedure is required. Comparative clinical trials between RFA and other therapies are warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van den Bos, R R, Wentel, T, Neumann, M H A, Nijsten, T]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.008090</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment of incompetent perforating veins using the radiofrequency ablation stylet: a pilot study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>212</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pyoderma gangrenosum; a rare complication of sclerotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Pyoderma gangrenosum may develop at sites of minor trauma and in surgical wounds. In susceptible people, even minimal trauma or irritation to the skin can result in the production of pyoderma gangrenosum lesions. This paper reports an unusual case of pyoderma gangrenosum following ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Felice, E., Allen, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.009028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pyoderma gangrenosum; a rare complication of sclerotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>214</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/215?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tenth Meeting of the European Venous Forum: Copenhagen, Denmark, 5-7 June 2009]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/215?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sommer, A, Shadid, N, Smith, P C., Kakkos, S, Lampropoulos, G, Papadoulas, S, Ntouvas, I, Tsolakis, I, Kalodiki, E, Adiguzel, C, Iqbal, O, Geroulakos, G., Vandendriessche, M, Lebard, C, Daniel, C, Zuccarelli, F, Uhl, J-F, Chahim, M, Casals, F J, Bernaudo, D, Lozano, N, the UFMATE Team, Sokolov, A L, Lyadov, K V, Loutsenko, M M, Lavrenko, S V, Metcalfe, M J, Gatenby, P A, Reise, J A, Franklin, J J, Chang, R, Lozier, J, Kam, A W, Chen, E A, Shawker, T H, Wesley, R A, Mao, E A, Wyrick, D A, Horne, M K, Kurtoglu, M, Ekim, H, Saba, D, Koksoy, C, Akcaly, Y, Gormuth, N, Karabay, O, Filizcan, U, Aslym, E, Dolgun, A, Mihmanly, M, Ceviz, M, Alayunt, E A, Eren, N, Broholm, R, Baekgaard, N, Just, S, Jorgensen, M, Jensen, L P, Kodati, S, Patel, V M, Makanjuola, J, Mobasheri, M, Hussain, T, McLafferty, R B, Moore, C, Hood, D, Hodgson, K J, Gasparis, A P, Labropoulos, N, Lebda, P, Spentzouris, G, Leon, L, Borge, M, Tassiopoulos, A K, Pappas, P J, Milic, D J, Zivic, S S, Bogdanovic, D C, Neglen, P, Darcey, R, Raju, S, Partsch, H, Partsch, B, Wust, M, Bahl, V, Hu, H M, Henke, P, Wakefield, T W, Campbell, D A, Caprini, J A, Cornu-Thenard, A, Uhl, J F, Carpentier, P H, Pittaluga, P, Chastanet, S, Locret, T, Gianesini, S, Menegatti, E, Tacconi, G, Palazzo, A, Liboni, A, Zamboni, P, Saarinen, J, Hjerppe, A, Venermo, M, Huhtala, H S, Vaalasti, A, Casoni, P, Nelzen, O, Mosti, G, Mattaliano, V, Partsch, H, Pichot, O, Alm, J, Vuylsteke, M, Van Dorpe, J, Roelens, J, De Bo, T., Mordon, S, Rasmussen, L H, Lawaetz, M, Bjoern, L, Lawaetz, B, Blemings, A, Eklof, B, Gale, S S, Lee, J N, Walsh, M E, Wojnarowski, D L, Comerota, A J, Ricci, S, Moro, L, Antonelli-Incalzi, R, Shepherd, A C, Gohel, M S, Lim, C S, Hamish, M, Davies, A H, Shepherd, A C, Gohel, M S, Lim, C S, Hamish, M, Davies, A H, van Rij, A M, Philips, L V, Bateman, E, Madut, D, Kleffmann, T, Jones, G, Rao, S, Konig, G, Leers, S A, Cho, J S, Marone, L K, Rhee, R Y, Makaroun, M S, Chaer, R A, Thors, A, Muck, P, Gohel, M, Lim, C S]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09a003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tenth Meeting of the European Venous Forum: Copenhagen, Denmark, 5-7 June 2009]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>European Venous Forum Abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lymphoscintigraphy in paediatric patients]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bellini, C, Bonioli, E, Boccardo, F]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.009012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lymphoscintigraphy in paediatric patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>237</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/238?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to letter 'Lymphoscintigraphy in paediatric patients']]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/5/238?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damstra, R J, Mortimer, P S]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09r002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to letter 'Lymphoscintigraphy in paediatric patients']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>238</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>238</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why are most ulcers located on the leg?]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Partsch, H]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09e003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why are most ulcers located on the leg?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>144</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/145?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes in venous function after foam sclerotherapy of varicose veins]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/145?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Foam sclerotherapy of varicose veins has recently proven to be an effective, economic and safe treatment modality. The present study attempts to evaluate the haemodynamic changes after sclerotherapy in addition to the clinical results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In a prospective observation trial, 67 sites (2/3 of which were recurrent varicose [RV] veins after previous treatment) in 53 patients were treated with polidocanol foam, and the results were assessed clinically, by duplex, photoplethysmography and strain gauge plethysmography.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>With the exception of two sites (3.0%), all treatments resulted at least in an improvement, and about 80% of the treated veins were completely occluded as demonstrated by duplex ultrasound examination. The haemodynamical results accordingly reflected a significant improvement of the venous function. Patients with post-thrombotic syndrome showed poorer results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Foam sclerotherapy is a highly effective and safe method for the treatment of primary and RV veins.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brunken, A, Rabe, E, Pannier, F]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.008068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes in venous function after foam sclerotherapy of varicose veins]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>150</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>145</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Venous Disease A-Z series: no. 11</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/151?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of eccentric compression by a crossed-tape technique after endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein: a randomized study]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/151?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the effect of eccentric compression applied by a new crossed-tape technique on procedure-related pain occurrence after endovenous laser ablation (ELA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>From April 2005 to June 2006, 200 consecutive ELA procedures were randomized to receive (group A: 100) or not (group B: 100) an eccentric compression applied in the medial aspect of the thigh. Patients were scheduled for a seven-day examination to assess the level of pain experienced. Pain intensity was measured using a visual analogue scale giving a numerical grade from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The intensity of postoperative pain was significantly reduced (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) in the eccentric compression group as compared with the non-compression one.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This technique of eccentric compression greatly reduces the intensity of postoperative pain after ELA of the GSV.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lugli, M, Cogo, A, Guerzoni, S, Petti, A, Maleti, O]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2008.008045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of eccentric compression by a crossed-tape technique after endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein: a randomized study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>151</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of quality of life in Mexican patients suffering from chronic venous disorder - impact of oral Ruscus aculeatus-hesperidin-methyl-chalcone-ascorbic acid treatment - 'QUALITY Study']]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The present study assessed the effect of <I>Ruscus aculeatus</I>-hesperidin-methyl-chalcone&ndash;ascorbic acid (HMC&ndash;AA) on the quality of life (QoL) of patients suffering from chronic venous disorders (CVDs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An observational, multicentre and prospective study was performed with 917 Mexican patients suffering from CVD. Patients were treated with <I>R. aculeatus</I>&ndash;HMC&ndash;AA. After 12 weeks of treatment, the physicians then assessed the patients' symptoms and QoL using Short Form (SF-12) and Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CIVIQ) auto-questionnaires.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients were mainly women (86.7%), overweight or obese (72.7%) or C2 (39.3%)&ndash;C3 (27.6%). All symptoms and ankle circumferences significantly improved over time, with increasing clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathophysiological (CEAP) classes and body mass index (BMI) (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001).</p>
<p>Concerning QoL, all dimensions of the SF-12 score significantly improved over time (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). Moreover, the CIVIQ scores significantly improved (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) with increasing BMI (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.002) and CEAP classes (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p><I>R. aculeatus</I>&ndash;HMC-AA significantly improved the symptoms and QoL of CVD patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guex, J J, Enriquez Vega, D M E, Avril, L, Boussetta, S, Taieb, C]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.008066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of quality of life in Mexican patients suffering from chronic venous disorder - impact of oral Ruscus aculeatus-hesperidin-methyl-chalcone-ascorbic acid treatment - 'QUALITY Study']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>165</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/166?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Endovenous laser treatment: a morphological study in an animal model]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/166?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The destruction induced during endovenous laser treatment (ELT) of the saphenous vein and the perivenous tissue in an animal model (goats) was analysed. Differences in vein wall destruction produced by two laser types, the 980 and 1500 nm diode lasers, were evaluated histologically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In 14 goats, 28 lateral saphenous veins were treated with ELT. In 14 veins we used the 980 nm diode laser and in the remnant a 1500 nm laser. Postoperatively the veins were removed at different stages and sent for histological examination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Immediately removed veins after ELT show an uneven destruction of the vein wall. Veins harvested one week postoperatively show inflammatory tissue at their periphery. Two and three weeks postoperatively, organization is very extensive. In some cases, recanalization begins in a semi-lunar manner at the contralateral side of the laser hit. Veins treated with a 980 nm laser show deeper ulceration with more perivenous tissue destruction compared with veins treated with a 1500 nm diode laser.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The ELT of veins produces an unevenly distributed damage. The cell necrosis is far more extensive than expected.</p>
<p>Uneven vein wall destruction can lead to recanalization. Using a 1500 nm laser correlates with less penetrating ulcerations and more circumferential damage.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vuylsteke, M, Van Dorpe, J, Roelens, J, De Bo, T., Mordon, S]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.008070</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Endovenous laser treatment: a morphological study in an animal model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>175</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sclerotherapy of varicose veins in patients with documented thrombophilia: a prospective controlled randomized study of 105 cases]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to assess thrombotic complications following sclerotherapy in thrombophilic patients in combination with thromboprophylaxis, in two randomized arms using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or warfarin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients and methods</st>
<p>This study received approval from the Ethics Committee. A total of 105 patients (81 females, 24 males) ranging in age from 20 to 82 years (mean 50) were selected: 75 with Factor V Leiden mutation, 18 with prothrombin 20210A mutation, 7 with high level of Factor VIII, 5 combinations of these. After randomization, 51 and 54 patients received warfarin and LMWH, respectively. A total of 199 sclerotherapy sessions were performed. Foam was used in 160 treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>No episodes of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred; no instances of DVT were revealed by ultrasound-monitoring.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study suggests that in the three most common forms of thrombophilia, sclerotherapy, in combination with thromboprophylaxis, can be performed safely. Prophylaxis with LMWH is easier to use than warfarin.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamel-Desnos, C M, Gillet, J-L, Desnos, P R, Allaert, F A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.008081</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sclerotherapy of varicose veins in patients with documented thrombophilia: a prospective controlled randomized study of 105 cases]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>182</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/183?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective five-year study of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/183?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy, safety and rate of recurrence for varicose veins associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux treated with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A five-year prospective study was performed, recording the effect on the GSV and saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) diameters, and reflux in the superficial venous system over time. UGFS was the sole treatment modality used in all cases, and repeat UGFS was performed where indicated following serial annual ultrasound.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>No serious adverse outcomes were observed &ndash; specifically no thromboembolism, arterial injection, anaphylaxis or nerve damage. There was a 4% clinical recurrence rate after five years, with 100% patient acceptance of success. Serial annual duplex ultrasound demonstrated a significant reduction in GSV and SFJ diameters, maintained over time. There was ultrasound recurrence in 27% at 12 months, and in 64% at five years, including any incompetent trunkal or tributary reflux even 1 mm in diameter being recorded. Thirty percent had pure ultrasound recurrence, 17% new vessel reflux and 17% combined new and recurrent vessels on ultrasound. Of all, 16.5% required repeat UGFS treatment between 12 and 24 months, but less than 10% in subsequent years. The safety and clinical efficacy of UGFS for all clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological elements classes of GSV reflux was excellent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The popularity of this outpatient technique with patients reflects ease of treatment, lower cost, lack of downtime and elimination of venous signs and symptoms. Patients accept that UGFS can be repeated readily if required for recurrence in this common chronic condition. The subclinical ultrasound evidence of recanalization or new vein incompetence needs to be considered in this light.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chapman-Smith, P, Browne, A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.008080</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective five-year study of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/189-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Letter regarding article titled 'Transilluminated powered phlebectomy: a clinical report']]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/189-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricci, S]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.009009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Letter regarding article titled 'Transilluminated powered phlebectomy: a clinical report']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>189</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/189-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to letter regarding article titled 'Transilluminated powered phlebectomy: a clinical report']]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/189-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akesson, H]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09r001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to letter regarding article titled 'Transilluminated powered phlebectomy: a clinical report']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>189</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/190?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Erratum]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/4/190?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09c001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Erratum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>190</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>190</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Erratum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/97?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phlebology: Exciting changes]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/97?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davies, A. H]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09e002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phlebology: Exciting changes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/98?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Catheter-directed sclerotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/98?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Catheter directed sclerotherapy (CDS) involves the use of a long catheter to deliver a sclerosing agent into a target vessel (saphenous trunks or venous malformations) under ultrasound guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims and Methods</st>
<p>This article reviews the history, current techniques and devices and the evidence as it relates to these procedures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>CDS was developed to increase the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (UGS). With the advent of foam sclerosants and tumescent anaesthesia, the procedure has enjoyed a higher primary success rate. CDS has a better safety profile when compared with UGS with virtually no risk of intra-arterial injection or sclerosant extravasation. Compared with endovenous laser (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), CDS is a quicker procedure with less associated pain. Some balloon catheters, however, have been found to force the sclerosant down the perforators causing femoral vein occlusion. Based on the current level of evidence, no firm conclusion regarding the efficacy of CDS techniques can be drawn in comparison with EVLA or RFA, but the primary success rate is probably higher than the standard UGS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>CDS ensures a safe intraluminal delivery of the sclerosing agent into the trunk of the saphenous veins using a single access point. This procedure preceded EVLA and RFA, and remains a safe alternative for the treatment of saphenous incompetence and venous malformations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parsi, K]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.009010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Catheter-directed sclerotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Venous disease A-Z series: no. 10</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/108?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pelvic vein reflux in female patients with varicose veins: comparison of incidence between a specialist private vein clinic and the vascular department of a National Health Service district general hospital]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/108?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Mounting evidence suggests that pelvic vein reflux is an important contributing factor to recurrent varicose veins. We compared the incidence in our specialist private unit (Unit A) with that of a District General Hospital (Unit B).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Results of all female patient lower limb duplex ultrasound (LLDUS) and transvaginal pelvic ultrasound (TVUS) scans performed over a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with refluxing veins emanating from the abdomen or pelvis on LLDUS (non-saphenous reflux) routinely proceeded to TVUS in Unit A.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In Unit A, non-saphenous reflux on LLDUS was present in 90&ndash;462 female patients (19.5%). In 81.1% of these, TVUS confirmed reflux in truncal pelvic veins (incidence 15.8%). In Unit B, non-saphenous reflux was present in 60&ndash;279 female patients (21.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>One in five women presenting with varicose veins have reflux of non-saphenous origin. This is the case in specialist and non-specialist units. One in six has associated pelvic vein reflux.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marsh, P, Holdstock, J, Harrison, C, Smith, C, Price, B A, Whiteley, M S]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2008.008041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pelvic vein reflux in female patients with varicose veins: comparison of incidence between a specialist private vein clinic and the vascular department of a National Health Service district general hospital]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>113</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/114?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transient adverse events positively associated with patent foramen ovale after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/114?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To prospectively study the association between patent foramen ovale (PFO) detected by contrast transcranial Doppler (cTCD) and adverse events (AEs) reported by patients after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for the treatment of varicose veins.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>All patients reporting AEs after UGFS were studied using cTCD directed at the middle cerebral artery to determine the Spencer grading score by counting high-intensity transient signals. Agitated saline was used as the contrast medium. The Spencer grading score determined the presence or absence of PFO. All patients undergoing UGFS received follow-up phone calls within 24 hours and again two weeks after the procedure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 3259 patients who underwent UGFS, AEs were reported by seven (0.21%) patients at their first session. These included visual disturbance, migraine and chest discomfort. Five (71.4%) of these seven patients tested positive for PFO by cTCD. The two-week follow-up confirmed no permanent symptoms.</p>
<p>Published studies show high sensitivity and specificity for cTCD when compared with contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The overall rate of AEs reported is consistent with published results. The presence of a PFO was detected in most patients reporting AEs after undergoing UGFS. While PFO screening with high sensitivity and specificity can be performed efficiently in the clinic setting, based on the literature, further investigation is warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raymond-Martimbeau, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2008.008060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transient adverse events positively associated with patent foramen ovale after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>119</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/120?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A comparison of interface pressure and stiffness between elastic stockings and bandages]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/120?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To compare the interface pressure during posture changes and exercise between elastic stockings and bandages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using a pressure transducer (air pack-type analyzer), the interface pressures associated with three different elastic stockings and three different elastic bandages were measured during supine resting, standing and exercise in 15 healthy volunteers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Short-stretch bandages showed a significantly higher static stiffness index value, which is defined as the pressure difference between lying and standing, than long-stretch bandages and short-stretch stockings (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, short-stretch bandages showed a significantly greater pressure difference between muscle contraction and relaxation in both tip-toe and knee-bending exercises than long-stretch bandages and short-stretch stockings (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Short-stretch bandages can be expected to have more pronounced benefits for augmenting muscle pump than long-stretch bandages and short-stretch stockings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hirai, M, Niimi, K, Iwata, H, Sugimoto, I, Ishibashi, H, Ota, T, Nakamura, H]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2008.008057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A comparison of interface pressure and stiffness between elastic stockings and bandages]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>124</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>120</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Endovenous laser procedure in a clinic room: feasibility and side effects study of 1700 cases]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the feasibility of saphenous veins ablation by laser in a clinic room. To study immediate and short term (1 to 6 months) complications and to pinpoint those that could be directly linked to this environment. Efficacy of the technique should also be documented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Retrospective study (22 centres) carried out in France and Switzerland. Patients with insufficiency of great saphenous vein (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV). Clinical stages of clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathophysiological classification (CEAP) were C2 to C6. Endovenous laser procedures were performed outside an operating theatre, under local anaesthesia and without high ligation. Efficacy criteria: occlusion of the vein and disappearance of the pathological reflux (duplex scan assessment). The side effects and complications were studied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 1703 procedures (1422 patients) were performed; 74% of the patients were women. The mean age of the patients was 57. A total of 1394 GSV and 309 SSV were treated (mean diameters 7.2 mm and 6.4 mm, respectively).</p>
<p>Overall success level was 97% and mean length of veins treated was 40 cm for GSV and 21 cm for SSV. Energy applied in joules per centimeter was homogenous (mean and median 64 for GSV and 65 for SSV). Complications were rare and &lsquo;simple&rsquo; apart from one pulmonary embolism which occurred 10 days after a GSV procedure, although no deep vein thrombus was found.</p>
<p>A total of two infections were observed: one was an infection localized at the site of access and the other was erysipelas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Except 2 limited infections (0.1%), this large retrospective study of laser procedures performed outside the operating theatre did not reveal any significant specific complications as regards the environment required. The efficacy results were equivalent to those found in the literature. Regarding cost and constraints induced by operating theatre environment, the clinic room should be able to offer an easier and economic alternative option for saphenous veins ablation with laser.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamel-Desnos, C, Gerard, J-L, Desnos, P]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2008.008040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Endovenous laser procedure in a clinic room: feasibility and side effects study of 1700 cases]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>130</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Side-effects and complications of foam sclerotherapy of the great and small saphenous veins: a controlled multicentre prospective study including 1025 patients]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Increasing interest in foam sclerotherapy (FS) for saphenous insufficiency has highlighted the need to study the side-effects and complications of this treatment. The aim of this study is to better assess their nature and incidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A multicentre, prospective and controlled study was carried out in which patients treated with FS for great (GSV) and small saphenous veins (SSV) trunk incompetence were included. Immediate untoward events were reported. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) examination was carried out to assess all patients between the eighth and 30th day. In addition, 20% of patients were called by an external auditor.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 818 GSV and 207 SSV were treated in 1025 patients in 20 phlebology clinics. Ninety-nine percent of patients were controlled with DUS and non-duplex-checked patients were all called. The saphenous trunk was occluded in 90.3% of patients. Twenty-seven (2.6%) side-effects were reported: migraine (<I>n</I> = 8, 4 with visual disturbance); visual disturbance alone (<I>n</I> = 7); chest pressure alone (<I>n</I> = 7); and chest pressure associated with visual disturbance (<I>n</I> = 5). Eleven thrombo-embolic events occurred: 10 deep vein thrombosis (DVT) but only five in symptomatic patients, and one pulmonary embolism that occurred 19 days following the FS without DVT identified by DUS. One transient ischaemic stroke, with complete clinical recovery in 30 minutes, and one septicaemia with satisfactory outcome were reported as well.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study demonstrates in a large sample of patients a low rate of adverse reactions after FS of great and small saphenous trunks. However, but the eventuality of exceptional but more serious complications has to be taken into account in the management of patients. A multicentre study like this one takes into account different practices and reports all possible complications, thus demonstrating the need for a common validated protocol.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gillet, J-L, Guedes, J M, Guex, J-J, Hamel-Desnos, C, Schadeck, M, Lauseker, M, Allaert, F A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2008.008063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Side-effects and complications of foam sclerotherapy of the great and small saphenous veins: a controlled multicentre prospective study including 1025 patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>138</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/139?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Liposarcoma of thigh presenting as deep venous thrombosis]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/3/139?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To discuss the differential diagnosis of a case with leg swelling and pain with special emphasis on soft-tissue malignancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower limb was treated with standard anticoagulants. In view of persistent symptoms for three months, repeat duplex venography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biopsy were undertaken to uncover the underlying pathology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Imaging and biopsy revealed a 5 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 11 cm myxoid liposarcoma, adherent to the vein, that was the cause of her persistent symptoms despite anticoagulation, possibly by its local mass effect and also by its potential to create a thrombogenic milieu. Excision of the tumour led to symptom relief. A Medline search of English language papers was undertaken to review related literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The report highlights the importance of considering neo-plastic masses as differential in painful leg swelling. Diagnosis is made by a high index of suspicion in atypical cases and confirmed by follow-up duplex or MRI. Treatment involves surgical excision that provides symptom relief as well as avoids potential tumour extension.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, N K, Kolluri, R]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.008077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Liposarcoma of thigh presenting as deep venous thrombosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>141</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Short Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The VEnous INtervention (VEIN) Project]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berridge, D, Lees, T, Earnshaw, J J]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09s001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The VEnous INtervention (VEIN) Project]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Introduction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interventions for uncomplicated varicose veins]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To review the evidence regarding interventions (compression, sclerotherapy, surgery and endoluminal) for uncomplicated venous disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed. In addition, bibliographies of published data and the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Review Group Specialist Register were examined. Publications describing an intervention for uncomplicated venous disease or trials comparing one intervention against another were considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Uncomplicated but symptomatic varicose veins are associated with a significant reduction in quality of life (QoL). Evaluation must include a detailed history and examination supported by non-invasive imaging. Although HHD is useful, its utility is limited in the popliteal fossa. It can not provide morphological/anatomical detail when considering an endoluminal treatment option. Regardless of intervention, all treatments considered are associated with a significant improvement in QoL at acceptable cost.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Uncomplicated symptomatic varicose veins lead to a reduced QoL, which can be significantly improved by all interventions considered.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bachoo, P]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09s002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interventions for uncomplicated varicose veins]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>12</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/13?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A systematic review of compression hosiery for uncomplicated varicose veins]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/13?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Compression hosiery is widely used in the prevention and management of symptoms related to varicose veins. However, there are still gaps and questions in relation to its benefit. This review seeks to examine the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of compression hosiery in the treatment of varicose veins.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating compression hosiery in the treatment of varicose veins were sought. Where RCTs were unavailable other evidence was included. Studies were included if they evaluated the application of compression to patients with a diagnosis of varicose veins. Twelve electronic bibliographic databases and 18 internet-based research resources were searched. Inclusion or exclusion of trials was decided by two reviewers acting independently.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The search strategy identified 25 studies. Eleven were RCTs or systematic reviews, 12 non-randomized studies and two guidelines. No consensus was found regarding the class of compression needed for the effective management of varicose veins. Wearing compression improved symptom management, but could be confounded by the exclusion of high number of non-compliant patients within the trials. Wearing compression to slow the progression, or prevent the reoccurrence of varicose veins could not be supported by the current published evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The evidence for the benefit of compression hosiery for varicose veins was equivocal. The published literature was often contradictory and had methodological flaws.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palfreyman, S J, Michaels, J A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09s003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A systematic review of compression hosiery for uncomplicated varicose veins]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>33</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/34?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Standard varicose vein surgery]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/34?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article examines the practice of standard varicose vein surgery including sapheno-femoral and sapheno-popliteal ligation, perforator surgery and surgery for recurrent varicose veins. The technique of exposure of the sapheno-femoral junction and the sapheno-popliteal junction is outlined and advice given on avoidance of complications for both. The evidence regarding methods of closure over the ligated sapheno-femoral junction is examined as is the requirement for stripping and the use of different types of stripper. The requirement to strip the small saphenous vein and the extent of dissection necessary in the popliteal fossa is also examined. Complications of standard varicose vein surgery are outlined. The frequency of wound infection, nerve injury, vascular injury and venous thromboembolism are listed and strategies to avoid these complications are examined.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perkins, J M T]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09s004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Standard varicose vein surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>41</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/42?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Radiofrequency ablation for uncomplicated varicose veins]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/42?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In recent years, minimally invasive endovenous treatments have gained popularity in the treatment of superficial venous reflux. The perceived advantages of endovenous therapy include reduced pain, high vein occlusion rates, and early return to work and normal activities. Endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) involves the delivery of thermal energy from a bipolar catheter to the venous segment to be treated. This technique has been available since 1998 and numerous devices and catheters are now produced. Numerous prospective and randomized studies have compared the effectiveness of RFA with traditional and endovenous procedures. In this article, the available evidence for clinical effectiveness, quality of life and cost gains following endovenous RFA is summarized. The scientific principles behind RFA and technical procedural considerations are discussed and standards of care for the delivery of endovenous RFA are proposed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gohel, M S, Davies, A H]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09s005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Radiofrequency ablation for uncomplicated varicose veins]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>49</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/50?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Endovenous laser treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/50?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of incompetent truncal veins has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional surgery for varicose veins. Various strategies have been proposed for successful treatment and this study reviews the evidence for these.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A Medline and &lsquo;controlled trials online database&rsquo; search was performed to identify original articles and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes for EVLA. Information on patient selection, equipment, technique and outcomes were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Ninety-eight original studies, including five RCTs, were identified. RCT data indicate short-term outcomes (abolition of reflux, improvement in quality of life [QOL], patient satisfaction) were equivalent to those for surgery. Long-term follow-up is not available. A further RCT showed superior outcomes for ablation commencing at the lowest point of superficial venous reflux rather than at an arbitrary point (fewer residual varicosities, greater improvement in QOL).</p>
<p>Non-randomized series suggest that laser energy of &gt;60 J/cm results in reliable truncal vein occlusion and that longer wavelength lasers may be associated with less post-treatment discomfort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In the short-term EVLA is a safe and effective treatment for patients with varicose veins. Long-term follow-up is still required.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darwood, R J, Gough, M J]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09s006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Endovenous laser treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>61</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>50</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/62?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Foam and liquid sclerotherapy for varicose veins]]></title>
<link>http://phleb.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/short/24/suppl_1/62?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The objective of this study is to review the methods and outcome of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for the treatment of superficial venous incompetence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Medical literature databases including Medline were searched for recent literature concerning UGFS. Papers describing methods and outcome have been assessed and their main findings included in this summary. A detailed description of the methods used by the author has been included as an example of how successful the treatment may be achieved.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A diverse range of practice is described in published literature in this field. Each group of authors used their own variation of the methods, described in the published literature, with good results. It is clear that foam sclerotherapy is far more effective than liquid sclerotherapy and that ultrasound imaging allows the treatment to be delivered accurately to affected veins. There is evidence that 3% policocanol foam is no more effective than 1% polidocanol foam. The optimum ratio of gas to liquid is 4:1, although a range of ratios is reported in published work. There is a wide variation in the volume used as well as the method by which it is injected. The use of carbon dioxide foam reduces the systemic complications, particularly visual disturbance, when compared with air foams. Very few serious adverse events have been reported in the literature despite the widespread use of this method. Rates of recanalization of saphenous trunks following UGFS are similar to those observed after endovenous laser and endovenous radiofrequency ablation of veins, as well as the residual incompetence after surgical treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>UGFS is a safe and effective method of treating varicose veins. The relative advantages or disadvantages of this treatment in the longer term are yet to be published.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, P C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1258/phleb.2009.09s007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Foam and liquid sclerotherapy for varicose veins]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Phlebology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>24</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>62</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>