Phlebology > Volume 23, Number 3 > Pp. 137-141

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Murphy, M A Articles by Hands, L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original articles

Is arteriovenous shunting involved in the development of varicosities? A study of the intraluminal pressure and oxygen content in varicose veins

M A Murphy  and L Hands

Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK

Correspondence: Michael A Murphy MD FRCSI, Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Level 6, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9JL, UK. Email: Michael.murphy{at}nds.ox.ac.uk

Objectives: Arteriovenous (AV) shunting has been postulated as the underlying cause of varicose veins. The aim of this study was to analyse pressure and oxygen content in primary varicose veins in order to determine evidence of arterial shunting.

Methods: Thirty-nine patients with varicose veins underwent cannulation of varicosities. The pressure and the blood oxygen content within varicosities were measured in different positions and during exercise. Similar measurements were made in the long saphenous veins of 10 control subjects without venous disease.

Results: Mean pressure in varicose veins in the supine position was 12.3 mmHg (Standard deviation [SD] 3.6 mmHg). Control subjects had similar pressures measured in the long saphenous vein. No pulsatile pressure tracings were obtained. Varicosity pressures in the erect position averaged 66 mmHg (SD 9 mmHg). In all cases, the pressure correlated with the distance of the varicosity from the heart. Pressure reduction in varicosities after exercise was significantly less than that in control subjects. Recovery time (RT 90) was also significantly shorter than in the control group. Mean venous pO₂ in varicosities was 4.5 kPa (SD 1.0) in the supine position dropping to 3.9 kPa (SD 0.9) on standing; these values were not significantly different to samples from control subjects.

Conclusions: AV shunting is unlikely to be a causative factor in the development of primary varicose veins.

Key Words: varicose veins • aetiology • AV fistulae • shunts • pressure

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?