RSM logo
Phlebology

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Phlebology 2008;23:77-84
doi:10.1258/phleb.2007.006018
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Wegen-Franken, C P M
Right arrow Articles by Neumann, H A M
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original article

Variation in the dynamic stiffness index of different types of medical elastic compression stockings

C P M van der Wegen-Franken*, P Mulder{dagger}, B Tank§ and H A M Neumann{ddagger}

* Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Elkerliek, Helmond, The Netherlands; {dagger} Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; {ddagger} Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; § (formerly)

Correspondence: C P M van der Wegen-Franken MD, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Elkerliek, Helmond, PO Box 98, 5700 AB, Helmond The Netherlands. Email: kvdwegen{at}elkerliek.nl

Objectives: To calculate the dynamic stiffness index (DSI) of 18 different brands of medical elastic compression stockings (MECS).

Methods: In all, 18 different brands of MECS that were divided into five categories (class II round-knitted, class II flat-knitted, class III round-knitted, class III flat-knitted and class IV flat-knitted MECS) were tested. The static pressure and dynamic pressure pulsations at the B1 level were measured with a newly developed dynamic pressure-determining device. The DSI was calculated.

Results: The DSI of all 18 brands of MECS showed higher values compared with the static stiffness. A wide range of dynamic stiffness indices was observed not only between all brands of MECS, but also within the five categories.

Conclusions: The DSI of MECS is independent of the compression class and the type of knit. The variation in the DSIs between MECS is not because of any measurement error and would indicate that different therapeutic effectiveness may be expected within one compression class. Therefore, a refinement in the current classification system for MECS with other characteristics such as the DSI is warranted.

Key Words: classification • compression therapy • dynamic stiffness index • medical elastic compression stockings


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Walking London's Medical History